According to Batten, the 31:1 positive impact ratio was calculated by researching and interviewing grid engineers, climate scientists, BTC mining engineers, methane abatement experts, and solar and wind installers.
The findings discovered 21 ways Bitcoin could be an environmental positive and just five ways it could be an environmental negative.
Environmentally, Bitcoin has a positive:negative ratio of 31:1
This mean Bitcoin is probably the most important ESG technology of our time
As a fund manager I’d opine its gross negligence for an ESG investor not to consider it in their mix
Here’s a data summary
— Daniel Batten (@DSBatten) January 12, 2023
Batten said that the findings were “uncannily similar” to those for the solar industry.
Many of the positives involved renewable energy grids and benefits from mining such as being the leading technology for responding to grid power demand from over and undersupply. Bitcoin mining farms can be switched on or off depending on power demand constraints.
Additionally, BTC mining can be a solution for geographic curtailment. Power curtailment is a deliberate reduction in the output below what could be produced to balance energy supply and demand, or due to transmission constraints.
There are also benefits in innovation and methane reduction, according to Batten’s findings.
The handful of negatives included network emission levels, e-waste production, and the opening up of previous fossil fuel sites. However, the environmental positives far outweighed these negatives, according to Batten who opined:
“Bitcoin mining’s rapid renewable adoption can inspire other industry sectors to follow.”
“We see Bitcoin mining can play a real part in global methane mitigation,” he concluded.
However, it did acknowledge that Ethereum saw its CO2 emissions drop from 21.95 million tons in 2021 to 8,824 tons last year, according to the data from Forex Suggest. The Ethereum Merge and switch to proof-of-stake last year reduced network power consumption by 99.98%.